This is a very popular post, and we have preserved the original punctuation.
Personally, however, I think the punctuation of the male perspective is misleading. One could argue that, from the male perspective, “without her man” is a defining modification clarifying exactly which woman—“a woman without her man.” If that is the case, it would be perfectly fine to write:
“A woman without her man is nothing.”
For a defining relative clause, commas are not needed to separate it from the main clause. With the commas, the relative clause reads as non-defining, implying that a woman is nothing and just happens to also be without a man.
How would you punctuate it?
58 Notes/ Hide
-
arabidninja likes this
-
friends--are--so--mainstream likes this
-
beatuglade likes this
-
folhadearvore reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
pandaqueer answered:
A woman without — her man is nothing.
-
thesoundofrain reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
marionto likes this
-
theredpensociety reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
tzvantzik likes this
-
mita56 reblogged this from grammarlyblog and added:
for my daughter-in-law...know. Especially...strong ones. And...
-
itsyouandmeuntilthestarsburnout reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
beautifulcheat reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
weeziewhattt reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
thesurrealreal reblogged this from thelasthairbender
-
mandywithawhy answered:
A woman without; her man is nothing.
-
polyglotted likes this
-
distant-sister likes this
-
ayuland likes this
-
thelasthairbender reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
metternichhateditaly likes this
-
notpumpkin reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
abclifeinletters reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
quietstorm1234 likes this
-
disquietinglullabies likes this
-
saphmira reblogged this from grammarlyblog
-
saphmira likes this
-
hardlyworkinggirl likes this
-
zphi93 likes this
- Show more notes
